What are some alternatives to the double-blind peer review system of academic journals? Not surprisingly, there are quite a few! Each model is trying to fix different weaknesses of traditional double-blind peer review (bias, slowness, opacity, gatekeeping).
Join JMLE Editors for an informal conversation to learn more about the options available as we consider a path forward.
DATE: Thursday, January 8
TIME: 9 AM PST/ 12 EST/ 5 PM GMT/ 6 PM CET
LOCATION: Online. Register here.
To prepare for a robust conversation, please read the document, "Possibilities for Revising JMLE Reviewing System" in advance of the meeting